From greg@math.math.ucdavis.edu Wed Sep  4 19:48:55 1996
Received: from math.math.ucdavis.edu (greg@math.math.ucdavis.edu [128.120.22.4]) by euclid.math.temple.edu (8.7.4/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA22255 for <tewodros@euclid.math.temple.edu>; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 19:48:53 -0400 (EDT)
Posted-Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 19:48:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received-Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 19:48:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from greg@localhost) by math.math.ucdavis.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA06973 for tewodros@euclid.math.temple.edu; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 16:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 16:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Greg Kuperberg <greg@Math.UCDavis.Edu>
Message-Id: <199609042348.QAA06973@math.math.ucdavis.edu>
To: tewodros@euclid.math.temple.edu
Subject: Re:  no subject (file transmission)
Status: RO

Good work.

In my formulation of the same q-analogue (for which I did not, however,
find the proof as you did), I used q^ij instead of q^(i-j+1 choose 2).

					Greg